In her Saturday column, Ellen Phillips discusses some of the problems with the nursing home industry in Tennessee. In addition to our state's low rankings, she points out how the big nursing home lobbyists keep trying to further weaken protections for some of Tennessee's most vulnerable citizens.
We commend Ms. Phillips for her excellent work and urge all of our supporters to post comments on the Times Free Press website telling her how much we appreciate her work.
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Monday, June 22, 2009
Don't let insurance companies dictate reform!
The industry knows the same thing we do, and they don't like it: the only way to make reform work for patients and payers is to allow the option of a public insurance plan. Obama has committed to that in the past, but insurance companies are trying to talk him out of his pledge with these promises to cut some unspecified costs, some years in the future. We need to have OUR say about that.
While we couldn't get into that room with the health industry lobbyists, we DO have access to the most widely-read public forum: the local newspaper.
Use this tool from our friend's at TrueMajority.org to write a letter to your local paper that reminds Congress and the President that health care reform needs to work for us, and demand a public option.
While we couldn't get into that room with the health industry lobbyists, we DO have access to the most widely-read public forum: the local newspaper.
Use this tool from our friend's at TrueMajority.org to write a letter to your local paper that reminds Congress and the President that health care reform needs to work for us, and demand a public option.
Monday, June 8, 2009
Public Health Insurance Option At Risk Right Now
There are now a few key dynamics jeopardizing the inclusion of a public health insurance plan in the Senate Finance Committee’s final bill. First, is that many of the champions of progressive health care reform are being pressured to work for a bipartisan, and less effective reform package. The pressure on the hill to push a plan with bipartisan support is gaining traction. And there is a real danger that passing a bill that everyone in the U.S. Senate can support could take precedence over enacting a law that everyone in America needs.
The second dynamic is a proposal that would establish a “trigger” for the creation of a public health insurance plan (a public health insurance plan would only be established if an arbitrary measure of market concentration were hit in a state). This would reduce the public health insurance option from a national plan with the capacity to make big improvements in how we deliver care to a series of fledgling state plans, developed in isolation and only when a state’s insurance market is in desperate shape.
Unfortunately, the “trigger” proposal is smart politics, and could provide an artificial “third-way,” allowing members to vote for a public option that will either never be created, or be created only under adverse conditions (on a state-by-state basis) that would increase the likelihood of its failure.
We simply cannot allow a public option with a trigger to make it out of committee. We need to talk with our state Senators (and ask Senators to talk to other Senators) and make it clear that a reform bill with a public option that’s held back by a trigger is not a reform bill it all. It’s simply a way to capitulate to the politics of the day and squander the historical opportunity to make a lasting difference.
The heart of the HCAN strategy is unity between the President, Congress and the progressive base. If the Senate Finance Committee were to pass the trigger it would fracture that unity, forcing us to focus resources on a fight in the Senate, raising people’s doubts about reform and diverting us from reform’s enemies.
The second dynamic is a proposal that would establish a “trigger” for the creation of a public health insurance plan (a public health insurance plan would only be established if an arbitrary measure of market concentration were hit in a state). This would reduce the public health insurance option from a national plan with the capacity to make big improvements in how we deliver care to a series of fledgling state plans, developed in isolation and only when a state’s insurance market is in desperate shape.
Unfortunately, the “trigger” proposal is smart politics, and could provide an artificial “third-way,” allowing members to vote for a public option that will either never be created, or be created only under adverse conditions (on a state-by-state basis) that would increase the likelihood of its failure.
We simply cannot allow a public option with a trigger to make it out of committee. We need to talk with our state Senators (and ask Senators to talk to other Senators) and make it clear that a reform bill with a public option that’s held back by a trigger is not a reform bill it all. It’s simply a way to capitulate to the politics of the day and squander the historical opportunity to make a lasting difference.
The heart of the HCAN strategy is unity between the President, Congress and the progressive base. If the Senate Finance Committee were to pass the trigger it would fracture that unity, forcing us to focus resources on a fight in the Senate, raising people’s doubts about reform and diverting us from reform’s enemies.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
